EDITORIAL: Taking Ownership of an Issue

EDITORIAL: Taking Ownership of an Issue


Last week’s real estate conference in Nusa Dua drew the heads of multibillion-dollar construction firms from around the world, many of whom expected to hear positive news from Vice President Boediono on foreign ownership of property in Indonesia.

They were disappointed, and left hanging.

The central government had said it was considering opening up the property sector to foreigners by allowing them to purchase apartments and other dwellings in certain areas of the country, mainly in Jakarta but possibly Bali.

This raised the hopes not only of investors wishing to embark on construction projects in this massive country but of foreign residents who have already bought property here under the peculiar “nominee” system that so often ferments trouble — when the Indonesian who owns the property for legal reasons decides they would like to own it not just on paper.

Boediono essentially said nothing on the issue — other than the government would like to liberalise the market but its hands are effectively tied. It is fractious politics that is blocking the road, not (necessarily) lack of leadership zeal. But observers point to the likelihood that such an all-encompassing scheme is never likely to come to fruition, given the complex maze of laws barring foreign ownership.

If that really is the case, that the proposal has died on the drawing board, it’s best to say so and move on.

Foreign construction firms are already here, however, but their scope of sales is limited. Others are waiting on the sidelines, until the ownership issue “becomes clear,” as one top executive attending the Nusa Dua meeting told this newspaper.

What is also not clear is the government’s reluctance to propel the Indonesian property market by an estimated US$6 billion annually by allowing foreign ownership. It need not be fearful: Our vibrant economy will only gain from the measure, and we only need look to our prosperous neighbour Singapore, where foreigners can purchase property, for proof.

1 Comment

  1. shorty says:

    what a load of self serving bullshit from the delegates.

    i speak only about bali. if government policy is holding back development, thank christ (or whoever). planning controls, not title concerns are of far more importance.

    the ‘nominee system’ is an attempt to cater to the western concept of freehold. who developed it? the people now condemning it. of course it’s fraught with danger. by any definition it’s a conspiracy to subvert the law, and by presidential decree could be outlawed.

    leasing is legal. past and current experience shows it is not an impediment to development.

    ok, maybe the initial contract period needs to be longer/more ameniable – 50 + 50? maybe there should be a government authority where leases are registered. lease documents are codified and have registered legal obligations on all parties.

    sales are not being limited by title concerns. oversupply, overhyped financial returns, hyperinflated prices,nirvana descriptions, shoddy buildings and greed are having much more impact.

Secured By miniOrange